If you find this site useful, please donate to support our work
Subscribe

Get our latest news by email:

Search

Looking for something?

Facebook
« Equal Opportunities Committee considers single fathers | Main | Merry Christmas »
Wednesday
Jan082014

Comments from a criminal defence lawyer

"The problem is that zero-tolerance policies are not compatible with the exercise of reasonable discretion, which in turn is why every household barney must now be categorised as domestic abuse and why police station cells are too full to house real criminals."

Not our words, although they fit with the experience of many of the fathers who speak to us.  Criminal defence lawyer Willie McIntyre commented in his blog about the Scottish Government's zero-tolerance policy, featured in the daily Scottish Legal News.

He describes the situation as follows:

"I'm a defence lawyer. Commercially, I'd be mad not to encourage more prosecutions, and, yet, where is the public interest in locking up a husband and wife on Christmas Eve, separating them from their child, just so that three days later the Sheriff can admonish him for shouting at her and grant the wife an absolute discharge for giving her husband a push? That was Christmas ruined for one small boy and for a pair of tax-paying, first offenders, their eyes opened to the pettiness of the Scottish criminal justice system. It's also one example from around eighteen similar cases at Falkirk Sheriff Court on 27th December, no doubt repeated across Scotland."

His solution: "What we need are trained, sensible people who can view a situation, assess what's happened and distinguish those who need to be locked up from those who should kiss and make up. We have those people already. Let them do their jobs."

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: click site
    Superb Site, Carry on the very good job. Thanks.

Reader Comments (2)

Good intervention by Willie McIntyre but glosses over the different consequences for couple in his example. Man admonished ie a conviction and he now has a criminal record that will be in the background should they separate or should he apply for a job covered by pvg. She has an absolute discharge and therefore none of the above consequences. Equality?.

January 17, 2014 | Unregistered Commenterfair comment

Police Scotland and the media have difficulty in separating "domestic abuse " and "domestic violence". Both acts are unacceptable one more unacceptable than the other !

And With the courts taking up-to 6months to fix trial dates with bail conditions fixed to prevent the perpetuator from approach this leaves children in some cases with no contact with their father or in the small minority of cases the mother.

January 24, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterSteven abbott

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>