If you find this site useful, please donate to support our work

Get our latest news by email:


Looking for something?

Find news about...
shared parenting (54) research (24) Parental Alienation (23) child support (16) consultation (15) contact (14) fundraising (14) family law (10) FNF Scotland (9) Scottish Parliament (9) bar reports (8) courts (8) CSA (8) legislation (8) AGM (7) child maintenance (7) CMEC (7) legal aid (7) party litigant (7) shared care (7) child protection (6) Christmas (6) contact orders (6) Court (6) Court reform (6) domestic violence (6) false allegations (6) fathers (6) lay assistant (6) parental involvement (6) parental rights (6) relocation (6) school information (6) contempt of court (5) divorce (5) family courts (5) family research (5) Father's Day (5) FNFS (5) leave to remove (5) male victims of domestic violence (5) mediation (5) parenting (5) Parenting Apart (5) Scottish courts (5) Scottish family law (5) absent fathers (4) conference (4) education (4) education in Scotland (4) enforcement (4) England (4) English family courts (4) family law reform (4) family law reform (4) film (4) funding (4) Hague Convention (4) high conflict disputes (4) ICSP (4) judgements (4) legal (4) McKenzie Friend (4) non-resident parents (4) parenting strategy (4) Public petitions Committee (4) School involvement (4) schools (4) Scottish Government (4) social work (4) sponsored events (4) sshared parenting (4) sweden (4) training (4) unmarried fathers (4) abduction (3) child support (3) children resisting contact (3) children's rights (3) children's views (3) consultation response (3) court rules (3) Cross-border issues (3) domestic abuse (3) education law (3) Equal Parents (3) Families Need Fathers Scotland (3) gill review (3) involving fathers (3) lay representation (3) local groups (3) maintenance (3) non-resident fathers (3) PA (3) Parental Alienation (3) Scottish Schools (Parental Involvement) Act (3) separation (3) shared parenting (3) Sheriff Court (3) shred parenting (3) SLAB (3) summary sheriffs (3) supporting fathers (3) survey (3) surveys (3) Tough Mudder (3) tv (3) 10k (2) Aileen Campbell (2) Australia (2) bedroom tax (2) breach of the peace (2) charging (2) child development (2) child maintenance reform (2) Child Welfare Reports (2) children (2) children's minister (2) civil court reform (2) CMS (2) complaints (2) contact centre (2) court delay (2) Court of Session (2) court reports (2) cross border (2) Cross Border cases (2) Dads Rock (2) debate (2) DWP (2) ECHR (2) edinburgh Men's 10k (2) England and Wales (2) English family law (2) Equal Opportunities Commitee (2) events (2) factsheet christmas tips (2) Family Justice Review (2) Family Mediation (2) fatherhood (2) Fundraising (2) GIRFEC (2) Glasgow (2) grandparents (2) habitual residence (2) holiday contact (2) Holyrood event (2) housing benefit (2) international abuction (2) international child abduction (2) interviews (2) Ironman Edinburgh 70.3 (2) ISCP (2) Japan (2) Justice Committee (2) Karen Woodall (2) law reform (2) Louis de Bernières (2) Malin Bergstrom (2) Mens 10k (2) Minnesota (2) national parenting strategy (2) new partners (2) Nicholas Bala (2) Nick Child (2) overnights (2) Pakistan (2) Parental Alienation Awareness Day (2) parenting courses (2) parenting information (2) parenting support (2) party litigants (2) Penelope Leach (2) relationship support (2) relationships (2) Relationships Scotland (2) reports (2) Safeguarders (2) Schools (2) Scotland (2) seminar (2) shared residence (2) SLCC (2) sponsorship (2) statistics (2) student intern (2) Supreme Court (2) Switzerland (2) TV coverage (2) videos (2) Warshak (2) welfare reform (2) year of the dad (2)

Entries in court reports (2)


Guide to Child Welfare Reports

The Scottish Government has published a guide for parents who are litigants in court cases in which a child welfare report is ordered (formerly called a bar report).

This is one of the changes arising from the working group that considered changes to the reporting system. The changes in court rules concerning these reports are noted in our article published when the changes were enacted in October 2015.

FNF Scotland welcomes the publication of this guide, and hopes that it will be brought to the attention of all parents when a child welfare report is ordered. Understanding how and why the report is prepared is an important part of the process. 

We have published a more detailed guide to child welfare reports, which stresses, amongst other things,  that you should focus on what will benefit your child when talking to the reporter, rather than complaining about the other parent.


'Professional experts' fail family courts

Family courts – and the children whose futures are decided in them – are being let down by 'expert' reports that are poor quality, incompetent and prone to subjective opinion rather than professional assessment.

Research conducted by the University of Central Lancaster and Mersey Care NHS Trust examined  the reports submitted by psychologists in 127 family court case files in England. The analysis rated 65% of the reports as 'poor' or 'very poor'.

It identified a growing number of psychologists who appear to earn a living exclusively from compiling reports for court and who are no longer in any professional practice where they meet patients. Traditionally expert evidence was rooted in experience from practice.

Lead author of the report, Professor Jane Ireland, drew attention to the fact that courts tend to rely on the evidence of single expert. It is therefore crucial that the expert is qualified, up to date and specifically qualified and experienced in the area s/he is being asked to assess.

On average experts charge £120 an hour for assessing families and compiling reports and can generate  fees of £2-£4,000  or more. That is more than they could earn in clinical practice.

Yet the research revealed a fifth of the 'experts' weren't members of either of the two UK regulatory bodies. Some experts had not even conducted interviews with the families they were asked to assess. On the other hand some contained subjective and inappropriate value judgements such as 'Miss X is an attractive mum and has a lovely personality'.  The authors state that the confidentiality of the family courts designed to protect the interests of the children involved has protected the 'experts' from proper scrutiny of the quality of their work.

Although this work relates to the English court system, Families Need Fathers Scotland is concerned that the same criticism will apply to Scottish court reports.  Research published last year by the Scottish Government raises similar issues.