If you find this site useful, please donate to support our work
Subscribe

Get our latest news by email:

Search

Looking for something?

Find news about...
shared parenting (52) research (24) Parental Alienation (22) child support (16) consultation (15) contact (14) fundraising (13) family law (10) Scottish Parliament (9) bar reports (8) courts (8) CSA (8) legislation (8) child maintenance (7) CMEC (7) legal aid (7) party litigant (7) shared care (7) AGM (6) child protection (6) contact orders (6) Court (6) Court reform (6) domestic violence (6) false allegations (6) fathers (6) lay assistant (6) parental involvement (6) parental rights (6) relocation (6) contempt of court (5) divorce (5) family courts (5) family research (5) Father's Day (5) FNF Scotland (5) leave to remove (5) male victims of domestic violence (5) mediation (5) parenting (5) school information (5) Scottish family law (5) absent fathers (4) conference (4) education (4) enforcement (4) England (4) English family courts (4) family law reform (4) family law reform (4) funding (4) Hague Convention (4) high conflict disputes (4) ICSP (4) legal (4) McKenzie Friend (4) Parenting Apart (4) parenting strategy (4) Public petitions Committee (4) schools (4) Scottish courts (4) Scottish Government (4) social work (4) sponsored events (4) sweden (4) training (4) unmarried fathers (4) abduction (3) child support (3) children resisting contact (3) children's rights (3) children's views (3) Christmas (3) consultation response (3) court rules (3) Cross-border issues (3) domestic abuse (3) education in Scotland (3) education law (3) Equal Parents (3) Families Need Fathers Scotland (3) FNFS (3) gill review (3) involving fathers (3) judgements (3) lay representation (3) maintenance (3) PA (3) School involvement (3) separation (3) Sheriff Court (3) shred parenting (3) SLAB (3) sshared parenting (3) summary sheriffs (3) supporting fathers (3) survey (3) surveys (3) Tough Mudder (3) tv (3) 10k (2) Aileen Campbell (2) Australia (2) bedroom tax (2) breach of the peace (2) charging (2) child development (2) child maintenance reform (2) Child Welfare Reports (2) children (2) children's minister (2) civil court reform (2) CMS (2) complaints (2) contact centre (2) court delay (2) Court of Session (2) court reports (2) cross border (2) Cross Border cases (2) Dads Rock (2) debate (2) DWP (2) ECHR (2) England and Wales (2) English family law (2) Equal Opportunities Commitee (2) events (2) Family Justice Review (2) Family Mediation (2) fatherhood (2) film (2) GIRFEC (2) Glasgow (2) grandparents (2) habitual residence (2) holiday contact (2) Holyrood event (2) international abuction (2) international child abduction (2) interviews (2) Ironman Edinburgh 70.3 (2) ISCP (2) Japan (2) Justice Committee (2) Karen Woodall (2) law reform (2) local groups (2) Louis de Bernières (2) Malin Bergstrom (2) Minnesota (2) national parenting strategy (2) new partners (2) Nicholas Bala (2) Nick Child (2) non-resident fathers (2) non-resident parents (2) overnights (2) Pakistan (2) Parental Alienation (2) Parental Alienation Awareness Day (2) parenting courses (2) parenting information (2) parenting support (2) party litigants (2) Penelope Leach (2) relationship support (2) relationships (2) Relationships Scotland (2) reports (2) Safeguarders (2) Scottish Schools (Parental Involvement) Act (2) seminar (2) shared residence (2) SLCC (2) sponsorship (2) statistics (2) student intern (2) Supreme Court (2) Switzerland (2) TV coverage (2) videos (2) Warshak (2) welfare reform (2) year of the dad (2)
Facebook

Entries in child maintenance (7)

Monday
Aug282017

Tribunal clarifies how shared care is decided in maintenance disputes

A recent Upper-tier Tribunal decision has clarified the position in child maintenance cases where both parents have equal amounts of child care.

The father in this case had been assessed by the Child Maintenance Service to pay weekly maintenance  because he cared for his child for 175 mights or more, even although there was an agreement that care should shared equally. The First Tier Tribunal agreed with this and also decided that because there were a number of nights when the child was in the father's care but did not stay at the father's address, this reduced his care to 172 nights, which meant it fell below the 175 nights threshold that would have halfed the maintenance liability.

The Upper Tribunal ruled that both aspects of this decision were wrong. The First Tier Tribunal had became unduly preoccupied with care proveded "overnight" as opposed to the "sharing of day-to-day care". In doing this it had failed to apply regulation 50 of the 2012 regulations, which sets the parameters for determining whether a parent is considered to be sharing care or is deemed to be non-resident and therefore liable to pay maintenance. 

Although regulations 46 and 47 relate to calculating the number of overnights in cases where care is not shared, the Upper Tribunal ruled that they should only be applied if the parent is being considered as non-resident under regulation 50.  In this case the agreement or court order for shared care meant that overnights didn't need to be calculated. Overnight care is not a trump card but is one factor to beconsidered along with others.

The Tribunal judge also commented that for overnight care to count it is a requirement that the child stays at the same address as the non-resident parent, but that need not be restricted to that parent's usual address.

Thursday
Dec152016

Training session on the new child maintenance system

As the new system for child maintenance (CS3) comes into use for many families, FNF Scotland is holding a training session in Edinburgh on Tuesday 17th January from 7-9pm.

John Fotheringham, a Scottish family lawyer who is very experienced in child support issues, will cover the structure of the CS3 system and how it differs from the previous scheme that was run by the Child Support Agency.  He will also talk about how variations and shared care are dealt with in the new scheme and how aliment interfaces with child support, all mainly from the viewpoint of the person who pays maintenance.

Described in one legal guide as a "guru for child support cases", John once claimed that his best experience as a lawyer was "Winning three child support cases in a single day — two of them at the Tribunal and the third one by making the CSA run away."

Admission is free, but please book a place using this link.

Monday
Jun302014

The charges are coming

Although child maintenance applications have been made under the new child support scheme (CS3) since last year, a major change to the system has been waiting in the wings for some time.

Charges for the child maintenance service carried out by the government have been threatened ever since the CSA was launched in 1993, but the continuing problems with the CSA meant that charging could never be justified.

Two major child support reforms later, one of the main features of the CS3 scheme is the introduction of disincentive measures intended to reduce the amount of Government intervention and persuade more people to sort out child support for themselves.

The Government will finally introduce a £20 charge for applications for maintenance assessment from this week, with "collection" fees starting from 11th August and further charges made if "enforcement action" has to be taken to collect money. 

These collection fees comprise a 20% surcharge for the parent paying maintenance on top of the assessed amount and a further 4% taken from the maintenance assessment before it is paid over to the parent receiving maintenance. The fees will only apply if the Collect and Pay Service is being used.

his means that for every £100 assessed, the non-resident paying parent will actually have to hand over £120. From this sum, the Government takes an administration fee of £24, leaving only £96 for the receiving parent.

The new charges won't be applied to people on the older child support systems, but over the next couple of years all existing CSA cases will be closed and the parents will have to re-apply under the CS3 system for maintenance assessments, collection and enforcement.

A parent paying maintenance who has a good payment record and doesn't have arrears cannot be forced to use the Collect and Pay Service.  Charges can be avoided on the new scheme by making direct payments or by making a family-based arrangement with your ex-partner. 

The main problem comes if you are in dispute about an assessment, or cannot afford to make the payments at the assessed level.  Adding a 20% charge on top of current payments, plus hefty enforcement charges, will inevitably cause major problems to some people, and the disparity between the 20% rate for parents who pay maintenance and 4% for those who receive it was strongly opposed by FNF as inequitable. 

Please let us know if you face problems with the new system.

Tuesday
Apr022013

Universal credit not treated as income in child maintenance calculation

Scottish Labour MP Cathy Jamieson's asked a question in the Commons about what the child maintenance liabilities will be of a single, unemployed, non-resident parent who becomes a non-resident parent while in receipt of universal credit.

The Minister for Pensions, Steve Webb, confirmed that the universal credit award is not treated as income for child maintenance purposes.

A non-resident parent on universal credit and not earning; for example, because they are unemployed, may be liable to pay the flat rate of maintenance.

Monday
Dec032012

Child maintenance in a widget

Help and support for separated familiesSorting Out Separation is a new web application from the UK Government, which is being distributed as what is known as a "widget" through a range of family web sites.

The aim is to provide support to the 300,000 families who separate in Britain each year, covering everything from how to avoid a separation to coping with the emotional impact of breaking up, accessing legal or housing support and arranging child maintenance.

While Families Need Fathers Scotland welcomes this new service, a first look at the site indicates that it hasn't fully recognised the different structures and organisations in Scotland and when a Scottish option is included it is listed as a variant.

UK web sites such as the CAB Adviceguide recognise the differences throughout and flag them up right from the opening page.

But we can report that it was fairly easy to embed in our web site - try it out for yourself on our support page.