If you find this site useful, please donate to support our work
Subscribe

Get our latest news by email:

Search

Looking for something?

Facebook
« Bar Reports: changes in sight | Main | Shared Parenting Bill published »
Monday
Nov262012

Family courts should be investigative not adversarial

Mr Justice Ryder, the judge who is in charge of modernisation of family justice in England, supported a change of emphasis for family courts in a recent speech.

Addressing the annual conference of Lawyers for Children, he suggested that : "The judge has to be more than the referee on a playing field where the parties (often without any direct involvement with the child affected) decide what issues they want to litigate and what evidence they are going to present."

"In future the judge should be the arbiter of what the key issues are that need to be decided so that the ultimate problem can be solved by the court and the judge should decide what evidence he or she needs. That may involve preventing parties litigating disputes that are not key i.e. where they are only marginally relevant and where it is not proportionate for the dispute to be resolved because the resolution of that dispute is not necessary for the ultimate decision that needs to be made."

"The problem can be described as how to retain respect for the court as the decision maker while involving professionals and families in the decision making process so that the family and their own community take responsibility for the problem to be solved and the solution identified, making the age old problem of compliance or enforcement of family justice a community and family based endeavour."

These comments come as English courts prepare for an increase of people representing themselves in  family cases when most legal aid is withdrawn next April.  Although Scotland is not affected by these cuts, this suggested move away from the adversarial approach to family cases could be just as relevant here.

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Family courts should be investigative not adversarial - News - Families Need Fathers Scotland

Reader Comments (1)

A have been at courts at least three times every year and all the time the mother will tell lies after lies to keep our son. A have been asking for shared access all the time now to be told no NO WAY. Even when its been proved several times its better for our child. the court will always go with the mother. even when our son sits down and will brake his wee heart because that is what he wants. they are no consideration a tall to what is the best for the child even when a can say ten names of people where the child gets past to every day because if her work its still best for the child to be with mum. the courts are a rip off the child will never be took into consideration.

August 16, 2015 | Unregistered Commenterrobert steele

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>